An extract from the article "A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review":

"By design, our results are very likely to be under-estimates as they reflect only a portion of the total number of journals worldwide. The numbers highlight the enormous amount of work and time that researchers provide to the publication system, and the importance of considering alternative ways of structuring, and paying for, peer review. We foster this process by discussing some alternative models that aim to boost the benefits of peer review, thus improving its cost-benefit ratio".

News from OA Italia mailinglist


Developed by Joomla3.x from www.Joomla.com